ÐÂÎűêÌ⣺2020ÄêÎÚ³ľÆëÃ×¶«ÇøÄÄÀï¿ÉÒÔѧÑÅ˼
ÎÚ³ľÆëÃ×¶«ÇøÑÅ˼ÊÇÎÚ³ľÆëÃ×¶«ÇøÑÅ˼ÅàѵѧУµÄÖØµãרҵ£¬ÎÚ³ľÆëÊÐÖªÃûµÄÑÅ˼Åàѵ»ú¹¹£¬½ÌÓýÅàѵ֪ÃûÆ·ÅÆ£¬ÎÚ³ľÆëÃ×¶«ÇøÑÅ˼ÅàѵѧУʦ×ÊÁ¦Á¿ÐÛºñ£¬È«¹ú¸÷´ó³ÇÊоùÉèÓзÖУ£¬Ñ§Ð£»¶ÓÄãµÄ¼ÓÈë¡£
ÎÚ³ľÆëÃ×¶«ÇøÑÅ˼ÅàѵѧУ·Ö²¼ÎÚ³ľÆëÊÐÌìÉ½Çø,ɳÒÀ°Í¿ËÇø,ÐÂÊÐÇø,ˮĥ¹µÇø,Í·ÍͺÓÇø,´ïÛà³ÇÇø,Ã×¶«Çø,ÎÚ³ľÆëÏØµÈµØ,ÊÇÎÚ³ľÆëÊм«¾ßÓ°ÏìÁ¦µÄÑÅ˼Åàѵ»ú¹¹¡£
Some ... £¨the type that the author does not approve £©
Èçͬ¿ªÊ¼¶ÎÂäÒ»Ñù£¬½áβ¶ÎÂäµÄд·¨Ò²ÊÇÓÐÌ×·¿Éѵġ£
Çë×¢Òâ: ¿ªÊ¼ÒªÑ¡Ôñ½Ï¼òµ¥µÄ¶ÁÎï .
ÕâÑù×÷µÄºÃ´¦:
×Ô¼º¾Í¿ÉÒÔÁ·Ï°¿ÚÓï,ÏëÁ·¶à¾Ã,¾ÍÁ·¶à¾Ã.
ʼÖÕÓÐһλ¸ß¼¶½Ìʦָ³öÄúµÄ²»×ãºÍ´íÎó---Ó¢ÎÄÔÎÄ.
develops a point of view on the issue that is vague or seriously limited, and demonstrates weak critical thinking, providing inappropriate or insufficient examples, reasons, or other evidence to support its position
·ÖÎö£ºÏÔÈ»»úÆ÷µÄ×°ÌîÁ¿ºÍʱ¼ä³ÉÕý±È£¬¹Ê±ÈÖµ²»±ä<ͼ>£¬Ñ¡ÔñA¡£´ËÌâ´ó¼ÒҪעÒâʱ¼äµ¥Î»µÄͳһ£¬»òÕß¶¼ÓÃСʱ£¬»òÕß¶¼Ó÷֡£
(A)rests on honest reporting, respect for news sources, and it requires balanced stories
·ÖÎö£ºÓÉÓÚ£üx£ü£½aaltx£½¡Àa£¬ËùÒÔx£3£½¡À<ͼ>altx£½3£<ͼ>£½<ͼ>¡£
Some toolkits were unable to parse the Unicode byte order mark sent by othertoolkits.
(A)but also more accurate
An essay in this category demonstrates little mastery, and is flawed by ONE OR MORE of the following weaknesses:
Just last week I received an invitation, via email, to plug a product which wouldheat my swimming pool, if I had one, which I do not.
I auditioned for the part of "Maggie" feeling perfectlyconfident in my portrayal of Elizabeth Taylor, however, I was unaware that my director saw exactly what I had been thinking. Unfortunately, I didn't get the part, and my director told me that he needed to see "Maggie" from my perspective, not Elizabeth Taylor's.
·ÖÎö£ºÓÉÓÚ£üx£ü£½aaltx£½¡Àa£¬ËùÒÔx£3£½¡À<ͼ>altx£½3£<ͼ>£½<ͼ>¡£
ÁíÍâÒ»¸öÖµµÃÎÒÃÇ×¢ÒâµÄ·½ÃæÊÇ£¬SATµÄ¸Ä½ø¾ä×ӵĴíÎóÑ¡ÏîÖУ¬´íÎóÍùÍù²»Ö¹Ò»¸ö¡£
ÕýÈ·´ð°¸£ºC
ÎÚ³ľÆëÃ×¶«ÇøÑÅ˼ÅàѵѧУ³É¾ÍÄãµÄÃÎÏëÖ®Âá£Ñ§ÑÅ˼¾ÍÀ´ÎÚ³ľÆëÃ×¶«ÇøÑÅ˼ÅàѵѧУ
Åàѵ×Éѯµç»°£ºµã»÷×ó²àÀëÏß±¦Ãâ·Ñ×Éѯ